The duplicity of the signs: Immanence and transitivity

immanence et transitivité

Authors

  • Arild Utaker Université de Bergen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52497/signifiances.v2i1.191

Abstract

The saussurian critic of a direct relationship between language and world imply the double essence of language. A sign is both a sound and content and is given in the system of language (immanence) as well as in speech or discourse. The immanence separates language from the world in a way that constitutes the possibility of talking about the world. This is the transitivity in the sense of Benveniste : to speak is to speak of something (“parler-de”). The dublicity of the sign signifies then that it is both a difference (“diabolique”) and a relationship (“symbolique”) to the world.

Published

2019-01-10

How to Cite

Utaker, A. (2019). The duplicity of the signs: Immanence and transitivity: immanence et transitivité. Signifiances (Signifying), 2(1), p. 61–70. https://doi.org/10.52497/signifiances.v2i1.191